Does a Personal Injury Lawyer in Scarborough Use 'Expert Opinion' to Strengthen a Case?
One of the important parts of any personal injury case is expert opinion. It often helps to strengthen the plaintiff side of the case. Personal injury lawyer in Scarborough uses their viewpoints to drive home certain points in favor of the victim. Here is why the expert opinions matter according to your lawyer.
Experience based opinions tend to be legitimate
The experience and the background of the experts tend to become legitimate base for the opinions they are presenting. The technical people and academics do not have the necessary training to think in this manner. They are able to back up various points using footnotes. Often, simple things like an expert enumerating their experience in a field, dealing with particular issues and basing their opinion on that help your case immensely. For the defense, cross-examining such testimony becomes quite difficult. This is especially when the experts have strong credentials besides coming across well. Personal injury lawyer in Scarborough makes their selection based upon such points.
Lending credential to supporting facts and strongest points
The best thing about the experts is that they have certain facts handy that prove to be the biggest support for their opinions. Often certain question might throw them off guard but the experts resort to the beginning of an answer having the most powerful points. This is a common strategy before attempting the answer to the questions of the defense counsel more directly.
Effective tackling of the more difficult questions
The experts used by the personal injury lawyer in Scarborough know very well that proof burden for plaintiff is the evidence preponderance in a typical situation. Oftentimes, the experts may not consider the most possible explanation related to some occurrence. This happens because from legal perspectives certain scenarios might be completely different from the norm. When defense lawyer ask the expert brought on by the personal injury lawyer in Scarborough about whether a specific scenario is possible, they point out that standard is always a probability. The scenario as described in question might be a possibility but is not a probability.
Dealing with the hypothetical with contrary facts
During the court proceedings, the defense counsel asks the experts to consider hypothetical facts but experts point out the in congruence between assumed facts and actual evidence. There is no chance of agreeing with factual assumptions that underlies the questions.
Use of 'this does not matter' and 'not necessarily'
The experts use the commonest escape route of beginning their answers by saying, 'not necessarily'. Personal injury lawyer in Scarborough considers this a convenient way to give responsive answer while providing an extended and leisurely avenue to experts for explaining the rule exceptions. Sometimes such exceptions emasculate general rules. 'This does not matter' works the same way. For more information visit Our Website